Quinn vs Moast: Shopify Video Apps Compared

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Quick Verdict
3. Quinn vs Moast at a Glance
4. What Is Quinn?
5. What Is Moast?
6. Feature-by-Feature Comparison
7. Pricing Comparison
8. Where Videowise Fits
9. FAQ

Introduction

Quinn and Moast are Shopify apps that turn short-form videos into shoppable storefront content. Quinn offers multiple display formats—including stories, floating widgets, grids, and pop-ups—and provides page- and video-level revenue attribution on its Growth plan. Moast supports shoppable video carousels and other placements, with unlimited video views on its free and $15-per-month Pro plans. Both support Instagram and TikTok content, and both are listed as Built for Shopify. Their main differences are how you want to display video, collect customer content, measure sales, and pay for the app. If your needs extend to managing video across many pages, there is also a broader platform worth considering.

Quick Verdict

Quinn is a strong fit if you want a broad choice of widget formats and page- and video-level revenue attribution. Its Starter plan is $9 per month, while the Growth plan adds advanced analytics and attribution.

Moast suits stores that want predictable, flat-rate pricing: its free plan has unlimited views, and Pro costs $15 per month or $165 per year. Pro also includes customer UGC collection and advanced analytics. Compare the plans’ other limits and features as well as their prices.

Quinn vs Moast at a Glance

Prices and plan limits are listed in USD. Annual options are shown separately from monthly billing; check the Shopify listing for the plan terms that apply to your store.

What Is Quinn?

Quinn is a Shopify shoppable-video app for placing short-form content in different formats across a store. Its options include carousels, stories, floating widgets, grids, and pop-ups. That range can help teams match a video presentation to the page: a floating widget and an embedded grid serve different merchandising purposes.

Quinn also offers analytics that connect video activity to sales. Its Growth plan includes page- and media-level revenue attribution, and the Unlimited plan includes advanced analytics and attribution. The free plan allows 550 video views per month, up to five videos, and two pages. Paid tiers increase those limits, while Unlimited removes the video-view cap. Merchants should compare both the included features and the annual or monthly price before choosing a plan.

What Is Moast?

Moast is a Shopify app for making Reels, TikToks, and other videos shoppable across a storefront. Its display formats include carousels, stories, grids, and pop-ups. Merchants can import social videos or upload their own, then tag products so customers can shop while watching.

Moast’s free plan includes unlimited views, basic analytics, Shop App publishing, and up to 10 videos per widget. Its $15-per-month Pro plan—or $165 per year—allows unlimited videos per widget and adds customer UGC collection, multi-product tagging, advanced analytics, and other features. Pro also includes a 14-day free trial. The app’s analytics report direct and influenced sales, so Moast is not limited to engagement metrics.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Shoppable Video and Product Discovery

Both apps let merchants turn short videos into shoppable content. Quinn supports Instagram and TikTok imports, product tagging, and multiple products per video. Moast supports importing Reels and TikToks, product tagging, and shoppable video placements across store pages.

The practical distinction is how you want videos to appear and what you need to learn from them. Quinn offers a wider set of widget formats and page- and media-level attribution on its higher plans. Moast pairs its video placements with basic analytics on Free and direct and influenced sales reporting on Pro. Test each app with several products from your catalog—including a video featuring multiple items—before deciding which product-tagging workflow suits your team.

Widget Formats and Storefront Placement

Quinn offers a broad range of display formats. Its options include carousels, stories, floating widgets, grids, and pop-ups. That variety can help a merchandising team tailor video placement to different page types, such as using one format on a homepage and another on a product page.

Moast also offers more than a basic carousel: its formats include stories, grids, and pop-ups as well as carousels. A store that wants to get social-style product videos onto its site without building a complex video strategy may find Moast’s approach straightforward. For either app, preview placements on mobile and desktop, and check that video does not compete with essential product information.

UGC Import and Collection

Both apps support social video content, but they differ in how their UGC tools are presented. Moast’s Pro plan explicitly includes customer UGC collection, alongside social syncing. That can help a merchant build a repeatable way to bring more customer videos into its storefront content.

Quinn supports making customer UGC videos shoppable, in addition to importing social content. If you are comparing either app for a UGC program, check how customers submit content, how permissions are handled, and how approved assets are organized. Importing and displaying a video is one task; maintaining a reliable flow of usable customer content is another.

Analytics and Revenue Attribution

Both apps offer sales-related analytics, with different plan details and reporting approaches. Quinn includes page- and media-level revenue attribution on Growth and advanced analytics and attribution on Unlimited. That can help a marketer compare performance across individual videos and placements.

Moast includes basic analytics on Free and advanced analytics on Pro. Its reporting distinguishes direct sales—when a customer clicks a product card in a video and then buys that product—from influenced sales, when a customer watches a video and later makes a purchase. Compare the reporting definitions and plan requirements against the questions your team needs to answer.

For broader video management across many pages, Videowise is another platform worth evaluating. Its documented capabilities include revenue reporting by video and widget placement, as well as bulk widget updates across hundreds of pages. No attribution dashboard, however, should be mistaken for a controlled test of incremental sales.

Shop App and Other Channels

Moast supports publishing shoppable videos to the Shop App, including on its free plan. Its Shopify listing also identifies integrations with services including Klaviyo, Judge.me, and Loox.

Quinn’s product materials highlight Instagram and TikTok imports, Meta Pixel, and Google Analytics. If Shop App publishing, email video, or another channel is important to your decision, compare the current channel options and plan requirements directly.

Store Speed and Core Web Vitals

Video widgets can affect loading and responsiveness, so neither app should get a speed win without a test on your store. Quinn documents lazy loading, CDN delivery, and AI video compression. Moast describes its app as lightweight and says it is optimized for store speed. Those implementation details and vendor claims are not independent comparative Core Web Vitals results. Built for Shopify is useful context, but it is not a benchmark for your theme, media, and page layout.

Test a representative product page before and after installing a widget. Check mobile loading, layout shifts, and responsiveness with the number of videos you actually plan to publish.

For stores where video delivery is a major performance concern, Videowise documents AI media optimization and asynchronous, lazy loading designed to protect site speed. Its stated file-size reduction is up to 97%, not a result every store should expect. Before-and-after testing still applies. See how Videowise approaches page speed.

Setup, Support, and Ongoing Work

Moast presents itself as a no-code option for adding shoppable video to a store. Quinn also offers no-code widget placement and several display formats, which can give teams more choices to configure.

That flexibility may be useful if a merchandising team plans to test placements, but it may matter less to a store that wants to add a single carousel and leave it unchanged. Try the setup with your own theme and content, and check what support is included on the plan you expect to buy.

Pricing Comparison

Moast offers the lower-priced unlimited-view option, while Quinn has a less expensive first paid tier and multiple plans for merchants who want different view allowances or analytics features.

The useful comparison is not simply $9 versus $15. At lower view volumes, Quinn’s Starter plan costs less and may provide the formats you want. If views rise beyond Quinn’s capped plans, Moast’s flat-rate Pro plan costs less than Quinn’s Unlimited plan. Quinn’s Growth plan adds page- and media-level revenue attribution; Moast’s Pro plan adds customer UGC collection, multi-product tagging, and advanced analytics.

Annual billing changes the effective monthly price: Quinn’s listed annual options are $90, $189, and $470, while Moast lists $165 per year for Pro. Compare the annual price, free-plan limits, and paid-plan features before deciding.

Where Videowise Fits

Quinn and Moast make sense for many stores that need shoppable short-form video without a large platform commitment. A third option, Videowise’s shoppable video platform, is worth evaluating when the requirement grows from adding a video widget to managing video as a measured channel across many placements.

Videowise supports shoppable video across product, collection, and homepage placements, with revenue reporting by video and widget placement. It also offers one-click imports from TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube, plus bulk widget updates across hundreds of pages. Those capabilities are most relevant to a team with a large content library, many product pages, or multiple stores. Its media optimization and lazy loading also make it pertinent to a speed-conscious evaluation, though actual performance still needs testing on the store.

The trade-off is cost and scope. Videowise is a premium, Shopify-first platform: plans suited to growing brands start around $239 per month, and separate shoppable-video, AI Clips, and live-shopping tiers can bring a fuller setup to roughly $479 per month or more. Pricing varies. For a merchant who only needs an inexpensive carousel, Moast or Quinn is the more sensible place to start. Teams considering the broader platform can book a Videowise demo.

FAQ

What Is the Main Difference Between Quinn and Moast?

Quinn offers a broad choice of widget formats and page- and media-level revenue attribution on its Growth plan. Moast combines several video placements with unlimited views on its free plan and customer UGC collection and advanced analytics on Pro. Compare the format, analytics, and plan details you need.

Is Moast Cheaper Than Quinn as Video Views Grow?

Moast’s Pro plan is $15 per month or $165 per year, with unlimited views. Quinn’s Unlimited plan is $49 per month or $470 per year. Quinn’s $9 Starter plan can cost less when your views stay within its monthly allowance. Compare the current plan limits and included features before projecting costs.

Can I Switch From Quinn to Moast or From Moast to Quinn?

Both apps support Instagram and TikTok content, so access to your original videos gives you a practical starting point for rebuilding displays. Do not assume widgets, product associations, settings, or historical analytics transfer between apps. Test the replacement on a few pages and document existing placements before removing the old app.

Which App Is Better for Store Speed?

Neither app has an independent comparative Core Web Vitals result established here. Quinn documents lazy loading, CDN delivery, and video compression; Moast describes its app as lightweight. Install each on the same representative page, use comparable videos and placements, and compare mobile performance before deciding.